With the state- and individual-level July employment data now in hand, we estimate the impact of the early expiration of enhanced federal unemployment insurance (UI) benefits in 25 states on employment, participation, and wages.
The state-level July payrolls figures do not show a statistically meaningful difference in job growth between states that ended UI benefits early and states that didn’t. But the more detailed individual-level data from the household survey of the employment report show clear evidence that benefit expiration increased the rate at which unemployed workers became employed.
We make four key findings. First, UI benefit expiration increased unemployed workers’ job finding probability by 6pp (vs. an average job finding probability of 27%) in July. Second, the effect is larger for low-paid leisure and hospitality workers (+15pp). Third the effect is entirely driven by workers who lost all benefits (+9pp), while workers who just lost the $300 top-up were unaffected. Fourth, the effect increases over time and was only +5pp in states where benefits expired on June 26 but +21pp in states where benefits expired on June 12. New academic research supports our findings.
We find no evidence of a boost to labor force participation—in fact, the estimated effect is negative, but statistically insignificant. This suggests that many workers are staying out for non-financial reasons such as concern about Covid and may be slow to return to the labor force even after UI benefits end.
The impact of benefit expiration on wage growth remains inconclusive. We previously showed that wages for ride-hailing service drivers—where wages change dynamically in real time in response to increases in labor supply—have declined more in states that ended benefits early. Average hourly earnings growth in the leisure and hospitality sector was also softer in these states in July, although the difference is not statistically significant.
Our findings reinforce our confidence that national UI benefit expiration on September 6 will boost job growth by another 1.5mn through year-end. But they also suggest that it might take longer for the participation rate to recover. We continue to expect the unemployment rate to reach 4.1% by the end of 2021, but now expect the participation rate to only reach 62.2%.
The state- and individual-level data underlying the July employment report have just been released, allowing us to estimate the impact of the early expiration of enhanced federal unemployment insurance (UI) benefits in 25 states for the first time. In this week’s Analyst, we estimate the impact of expiration on employment, labor force participation, and wage growth and then update our labor market forecasts for the rest of 2021 to incorporate our findings.
In between the survey weeks for the June and July employment reports, 25 states accounting for one-fourth of benefit recipients ended the $300 federal UI top-up payment, and all but three of these states opted out of other federal UI programs that extended the duration of benefits and eligibility to include gig workers (Exhibit 1).
Because job losses remain concentrated in low-wage industries, the federal enhanced UI benefits are large relative to normal wages for many benefit recipients. We estimate that the median UI recipient received a benefit worth roughly 90% of their prior wage and that almost half of workers earned more from benefits than from their prior job (Exhibit 2). Without the $300 top-up, the median wage replacement rate would drop to roughly 50%.
Both this significant decline in replacement rates and the difficulty of making ends meet with a more modest benefit are likely to lead many UI recipients or former recipients to search more actively for work and be more willing to accept a job offer. Our review of pre-pandemic academic studies suggests that at least some workers seek employment when UI benefits become less generous (Exhibit 3). On average, these studies find that a 10% decline in the duration of UI benefits shortens unemployment spells by 2.7%, and that a 10% decline in the benefit replacement rate shortens unemployment spells by 6%. This implies that the full loss of UI benefits that previously replaced 90% of normal wages would reduce the duration of unemployment by 54%. In principle the effect under current conditions might either be larger because labor demand is so strong, or smaller because some workers fear exposure to Covid at work.
Our analysis of the state-level data in the June employment report suggested that early UI benefit expiration did not provide a boost to employment, most likely because no states had actually ended enhanced benefits before the survey week.
We again find little difference in July in net employment outcomes in the establishment and household surveys across states that did and did not end benefits early (Exhibit 4). We also find no cross-state differences in employment in low-wage industries like leisure and hospitality that should be more sensitive to changes in unemployment benefit generosity. While this is surprising, highly aggregated data might mask underlying effects, perhaps because the two groups of states may have other differences that confound the comparison.
We therefore turn to the more detailed individual-level data from the household survey of the employment report. Here we find strong evidence that benefit expiration has increased the rate at which unemployed workers start jobs.
Our analysis relies on a set of person-level panel regressions. In all regressions we control for state- and time-fixed effects, as well as age, sex, marital status, education, household income, and—when applicable—the industry and occupation of a respondent’s current or prior job. Our estimate of the impact of UI benefit expiration on employment is the coefficient on the interaction between month-fixed effects and an indicator of whether the respondent lives in a state that ended federal UI benefits prior to the July survey’s reference period. Intuitively, this coefficient captures the average difference in the probability of becoming employed each month between individuals that did and did not lose benefits, controlling for other factors. The hypothesis we are testing is that early expiration boosted the probability of finding a job in July.
Our analysis provides four key findings.
First, unemployed workers’ job finding probability in states that ended benefits increased by 6pp in July (vs. an average job finding probability of 27%; left chart, Exhibit 5). We find no statistically significant effect on employment in prior months, suggesting that benefit expirations are responsible for the July increase and that workers only responded when benefit expiration was implemented, not when it was announced.
Our estimated effect is economically and statistically significant. It implies that if benefits had expired nationwide, July job growth would have been 400k higher at over 1.3mn. In fact, this might be a conservative estimate of the monthly job boost from benefit expiration because most states didn’t end benefits until later in the month, although our 95% confidence interval can’t rule out incremental job gains from nationwide expiration of benefits as small as 25k or as large as 650k.
Second, the effect on employment is more than twice as large for low-paid leisure and hospitality workers (+15pp), who were initially much more likely to earn more from UI benefits than they would from working, but were also quite likely to find a job once they started looking due to very high labor demand (right chart, Exhibit 5).
Third, the effect is driven by workers who lost all benefits (+9pp), while the effect on workers who lost just the $300 top-up—either because they lived in a state that continued federal programs that expanded eligibility (PUA) or extended benefit duration (PEUC), or because they remained eligible for regular state claims—was close to zero and statistically insignificant (left chart, Exhibit 6).
Fourth, the effect increases over time. The increase in job finding probability was only +5pp in states where benefits expired on June 26, but +21pp in states where benefits expired on June 12, suggesting that transitions to employment do not happen immediately and take some time after benefits expire (right chart, Exhibit 6).
Our findings are broadly consistent with a new academic study released this morning that uses bank account-level data to measure the impact of benefit expiration. Similar to our results, the authors find positive employment effects primarily driven by workers who lost all benefits, but note that incomes and spending decline on net for benefit losers because benefits offered a high replacement rate and not everyone finds a job immediately. Indeed, the pullback in UI benefits and other income support is one reason why we forecast a negative fiscal impulse in 2021H2 and 2022.
While early UI benefit expiration increased the job finding probability of unemployed workers, it did not cause workers who had left the labor force to return. We find a slightly negative but statistically insignificant effect on labor force entry probability among prime-age workers (left chart, Exhibit 7) that is partially explained by lower transitions into employment (right chart, Exhibit 7). As expected, we find no effect on the employment probability of previously employed workers.
The negative effect on labor force nonparticipants helps reconcile our findings from the state- and individual-level data. The change total employment shown in Exhibit 4 reflects the sum of the employment contributions from unemployed workers, employed workers, and workers that were not in the labor force. Although only the effect on unemployed workers’ employment probability is large and statistically significant, the population of unemployed workers in states that ended benefits is small (3.1% of their adult population) relative to employed workers (54.4%) and those not in the labor force (42.5%). As a result, the small decline in the job-finding rate of nonparticipants offsets the boost from unemployed workers, leaving the net effect on employment close to zero (Exhibit 8).
There is no intuitive reason why benefit expiration would encourage workers to stay out of the labor force, and we therefore expect the negative impact on labor force entry to unwind in the coming months. However, our findings also suggest that many workers that have left the labor force since the start of the pandemic did so for non-financial reasons such as concern about Covid, and may be slow to return to the labor force even after UI benefits end.
We also see some early signs that UI benefit expiration is leading to softer wage growth, although the evidence remains inconclusive. Using data from Gridwise Analytics, we previously showed that wages for ride-hailing service drivers—where wages change dynamically in real time in response to changes in labor supply—have declined more in states that ended benefits early (Exhibit 9).
Returning to the state-level establishment survey data, we also find that average hourly earnings (AHE) growth in the leisure and hospitality sector was softer in July for states that ended benefits early than for states that did not, although the difference is not statistically significant (left chart, Exhibit 10). However, AHE growth was slightly firmer in other industries (right chart, Exhibit 10), suggesting that it may take some time for UI benefit expiration and increased labor supply to have a clearly visible impact on wage growth, outside of sectors such as ride-hailing services with real-time wage setting.
The July data increase our confidence that benefit expiration will lead many unemployed individuals to search more actively for work and be more willing to accept job offers this fall. In a labor market where job opportunities are plentiful, this should boost hiring meaningfully. Exhibit 11 shows that we expect UI benefit expiration to contribute 1.5mn to payroll gains between now and end-2021. In light of our findings that the effect of benefit expiration grows over time and because the September survey period is just one week after benefits expire in all states, we now expect the peak payrolls contribution from UI expiration will arrive in October, but still anticipate a sizeable hiring boost in September.
Our finding that benefit expiration did not encourage labor force participation was a somewhat negative surprise, and increases the risk that some workers may be slow to return to the labor force, particularly if the Delta variant increases concerns around health risk. We have therefore nudged down our participation rate forecast to 62.2% at end-2021, although we continue to expect a recovery to 62.4% by end-2022.
Exhibit 12 decomposes our forecast for total payroll growth in the remaining months of the year. We expect job growth to peak in September thanks to large contributions from UI benefit expiration, school reopening, and seasonality distortions. Overall, we expect payroll gains of 650k in August, 900k in September, 750k in October, 625k in November, and 475k in December, and we continue to expect that the unemployment rate will fall to 4.1% at end-2021 and 3.5% at end-2022.
Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For Reg AC certification and other important disclosures, see the Disclosure Appendix, or go to www.gs.com/research/hedge.html.
We, Jan Hatzius, Alec Phillips, David Mericle, Spencer Hill, CFA, Joseph Briggs and Ronnie Walker, hereby certify that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect our personal views, which have not been influenced by considerations of the firm's business or client relationships.
Unless otherwise stated, the individuals listed on the cover page of this report are analysts in Goldman Sachs' Global Investment Research division.
See company-specific regulatory disclosures above for any of the following disclosures required as to companies referred to in this report: manager or co-manager in a pending transaction; 1% or other ownership; compensation for certain services; types of client relationships; managed/co-managed public offerings in prior periods; directorships; for equity securities, market making and/or specialist role. Goldman Sachs trades or may trade as a principal in debt securities (or in related derivatives) of issuers discussed in this report.
The following are additional required disclosures: Ownership and material conflicts of interest: Goldman Sachs policy prohibits its analysts, professionals reporting to analysts and members of their households from owning securities of any company in the analyst's area of coverage. Analyst compensation: Analysts are paid in part based on the profitability of Goldman Sachs, which includes investment banking revenues. Analyst as officer or director: Goldman Sachs policy generally prohibits its analysts, persons reporting to analysts or members of their households from serving as an officer, director or advisor of any company in the analyst's area of coverage. Non-U.S. Analysts: Non-U.S. analysts may not be associated persons of Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and therefore may not be subject to FINRA Rule 2241 or FINRA Rule 2242 restrictions on communications with subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by the analysts.
The following disclosures are those required by the jurisdiction indicated, except to the extent already made above pursuant to United States laws and regulations. Australia: Goldman Sachs Australia Pty Ltd and its affiliates are not authorised deposit-taking institutions (as that term is defined in the Banking Act 1959 (Cth)) in Australia and do not provide banking services, nor carry on a banking business, in Australia. This research, and any access to it, is intended only for "wholesale clients" within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act, unless otherwise agreed by Goldman Sachs. In producing research reports, members of the Global Investment Research Division of Goldman Sachs Australia may attend site visits and other meetings hosted by the companies and other entities which are the subject of its research reports. In some instances the costs of such site visits or meetings may be met in part or in whole by the issuers concerned if Goldman Sachs Australia considers it is appropriate and reasonable in the specific circumstances relating to the site visit or meeting. To the extent that the contents of this document contains any financial product advice, it is general advice only and has been prepared by Goldman Sachs without taking into account a client's objectives, financial situation or needs. A client should, before acting on any such advice, consider the appropriateness of the advice having regard to the client's own objectives, financial situation and needs. A copy of certain Goldman Sachs Australia and New Zealand disclosure of interests and a copy of Goldman Sachs’ Australian Sell-Side Research Independence Policy Statement are available at: https://www.goldmansachs.com/disclosures/australia-new-zealand/index.html. Brazil: Disclosure information in relation to CVM Resolution n. 20 is available at https://www.gs.com/worldwide/brazil/area/gir/index.html. Where applicable, the Brazil-registered analyst primarily responsible for the content of this research report, as defined in Article 20 of CVM Resolution n. 20, is the first author named at the beginning of this report, unless indicated otherwise at the end of the text. Canada: Goldman Sachs Canada Inc. is an affiliate of The Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and therefore is included in the company specific disclosures relating to Goldman Sachs (as defined above). Goldman Sachs Canada Inc. has approved of, and agreed to take responsibility for, this research report in Canada if and to the extent that Goldman Sachs Canada Inc. disseminates this research report to its clients. Hong Kong: Further information on the securities of covered companies referred to in this research may be obtained on request from Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C. India: Further information on the subject company or companies referred to in this research may be obtained from Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Private Limited, Research Analyst - SEBI Registration Number INH000001493, 951-A, Rational House, Appasaheb Marathe Marg, Prabhadevi, Mumbai 400 025, India, Corporate Identity Number U74140MH2006FTC160634, Phone +91 22 6616 9000, Fax +91 22 6616 9001. Goldman Sachs may beneficially own 1% or more of the securities (as such term is defined in clause 2 (h) the Indian Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956) of the subject company or companies referred to in this research report. Japan: See below. Korea: This research, and any access to it, is intended only for "professional investors" within the meaning of the Financial Services and Capital Markets Act, unless otherwise agreed by Goldman Sachs. Further information on the subject company or companies referred to in this research may be obtained from Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Seoul Branch. New Zealand: Goldman Sachs New Zealand Limited and its affiliates are neither "registered banks" nor "deposit takers" (as defined in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989) in New Zealand. This research, and any access to it, is intended for "wholesale clients" (as defined in the Financial Advisers Act 2008) unless otherwise agreed by Goldman Sachs. A copy of certain Goldman Sachs Australia and New Zealand disclosure of interests is available at: https://www.goldmansachs.com/disclosures/australia-new-zealand/index.html. Russia: Research reports distributed in the Russian Federation are not advertising as defined in the Russian legislation, but are information and analysis not having product promotion as their main purpose and do not provide appraisal within the meaning of the Russian legislation on appraisal activity. Research reports do not constitute a personalized investment recommendation as defined in Russian laws and regulations, are not addressed to a specific client, and are prepared without analyzing the financial circumstances, investment profiles or risk profiles of clients. Goldman Sachs assumes no responsibility for any investment decisions that may be taken by a client or any other person based on this research report. Singapore: Goldman Sachs (Singapore) Pte. (Company Number: 198602165W), which is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, accepts legal responsibility for this research, and should be contacted with respect to any matters arising from, or in connection with, this research. Taiwan: This material is for reference only and must not be reprinted without permission. Investors should carefully consider their own investment risk. Investment results are the responsibility of the individual investor. United Kingdom: Persons who would be categorized as retail clients in the United Kingdom, as such term is defined in the rules of the Financial Conduct Authority, should read this research in conjunction with prior Goldman Sachs research on the covered companies referred to herein and should refer to the risk warnings that have been sent to them by Goldman Sachs International. A copy of these risks warnings, and a glossary of certain financial terms used in this report, are available from Goldman Sachs International on request.
European Union and United Kingdom: Disclosure information in relation to Article 6 (2) of the European Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) (2016/958) supplementing Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (including as that Delegated Regulation is implemented into United Kingdom domestic law and regulation following the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union and the European Economic Area) with regard to regulatory technical standards for the technical arrangements for objective presentation of investment recommendations or other information recommending or suggesting an investment strategy and for disclosure of particular interests or indications of conflicts of interest is available at https://www.gs.com/disclosures/europeanpolicy.html which states the European Policy for Managing Conflicts of Interest in Connection with Investment Research.
Japan: Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd. is a Financial Instrument Dealer registered with the Kanto Financial Bureau under registration number Kinsho 69, and a member of Japan Securities Dealers Association, Financial Futures Association of Japan and Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association. Sales and purchase of equities are subject to commission pre-determined with clients plus consumption tax. See company-specific disclosures as to any applicable disclosures required by Japanese stock exchanges, the Japanese Securities Dealers Association or the Japanese Securities Finance Company.
The Global Investment Research Division of Goldman Sachs produces and distributes research products for clients of Goldman Sachs on a global basis. Analysts based in Goldman Sachs offices around the world produce research on industries and companies, and research on macroeconomics, currencies, commodities and portfolio strategy. This research is disseminated in Australia by Goldman Sachs Australia Pty Ltd (ABN 21 006 797 897); in Brazil by Goldman Sachs do Brasil Corretora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários S.A.; Public Communication Channel Goldman Sachs Brazil: 0800 727 5764 and / or firstname.lastname@example.org. Available Weekdays (except holidays), from 9am to 6pm. Canal de Comunicação com o Público Goldman Sachs Brasil: 0800 727 5764 e/ou email@example.com. Horário de funcionamento: segunda-feira à sexta-feira (exceto feriados), das 9h às 18h; in Canada by either Goldman Sachs Canada Inc. or Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC; in Hong Kong by Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.; in India by Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Private Ltd.; in Japan by Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd.; in the Republic of Korea by Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Seoul Branch; in New Zealand by Goldman Sachs New Zealand Limited; in Russia by OOO Goldman Sachs; in Singapore by Goldman Sachs (Singapore) Pte. (Company Number: 198602165W); and in the United States of America by Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC. Goldman Sachs International has approved this research in connection with its distribution in the United Kingdom.
Effective from the date of the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union and the European Economic Area (“Brexit Day”) the following information with respect to distributing entities will apply:
Goldman Sachs International (“GSI”), authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”) and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and the PRA, has approved this research in connection with its distribution in the United Kingdom.
European Economic Area: GSI, authorised by the PRA and regulated by the FCA and the PRA, disseminates research in the following jurisdictions within the European Economic Area: the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Italy, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of Finland, Portugal, the Republic of Cyprus and the Republic of Ireland; GS -Succursale de Paris (Paris branch) which, from Brexit Day, will be authorised by the French Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de resolution (“ACPR”) and regulated by the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de resolution and the Autorité des marches financiers (“AMF”) disseminates research in France; GSI - Sucursal en España (Madrid branch) authorized in Spain by the Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores disseminates research in the Kingdom of Spain; GSI - Sweden Bankfilial (Stockholm branch) is authorized by the SFSA as a “third country branch” in accordance with Chapter 4, Section 4 of the Swedish Securities and Market Act (Sw. lag (2007:528) om värdepappersmarknaden) disseminates research in the Kingdom of Sweden; Goldman Sachs Bank Europe SE (“GSBE”) is a credit institution incorporated in Germany and, within the Single Supervisory Mechanism, subject to direct prudential supervision by the European Central Bank and in other respects supervised by German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, BaFin) and Deutsche Bundesbank and disseminates research in the Federal Republic of Germany and those jurisdictions within the European Economic Area where GSI is not authorised to disseminate research and additionally, GSBE, Copenhagen Branch filial af GSBE, Tyskland, supervised by the Danish Financial Authority disseminates research in the Kingdom of Denmark; GSBE - Sucursal en España (Madrid branch) subject (to a limited extent) to local supervision by the Bank of Spain disseminates research in the Kingdom of Spain; GSBE - Succursale Italia (Milan branch) to the relevant applicable extent, subject to local supervision by the Bank of Italy (Banca d’Italia) and the Italian Companies and Exchange Commission (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa “Consob”) disseminates research in Italy; GSBE - Succursale de Paris (Paris branch), supervised by the AMF and by the ACPR disseminates research in France; and GSBE - Sweden Bankfilial (Stockholm branch), to a limited extent, subject to local supervision by the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (Finansinpektionen) disseminates research in the Kingdom of Sweden.
This research is for our clients only. Other than disclosures relating to Goldman Sachs, this research is based on current public information that we consider reliable, but we do not represent it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. The information, opinions, estimates and forecasts contained herein are as of the date hereof and are subject to change without prior notification. We seek to update our research as appropriate, but various regulations may prevent us from doing so. Other than certain industry reports published on a periodic basis, the large majority of reports are published at irregular intervals as appropriate in the analyst's judgment.
Goldman Sachs conducts a global full-service, integrated investment banking, investment management, and brokerage business. We have investment banking and other business relationships with a substantial percentage of the companies covered by our Global Investment Research Division. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, the United States broker dealer, is a member of SIPC (https://www.sipc.org).
Our salespeople, traders, and other professionals may provide oral or written market commentary or trading strategies to our clients and principal trading desks that reflect opinions that are contrary to the opinions expressed in this research. Our asset management area, principal trading desks and investing businesses may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations or views expressed in this research.
We and our affiliates, officers, directors, and employees, will from time to time have long or short positions in, act as principal in, and buy or sell, the securities or derivatives, if any, referred to in this research, unless otherwise prohibited by regulation or Goldman Sachs policy.
The views attributed to third party presenters at Goldman Sachs arranged conferences, including individuals from other parts of Goldman Sachs, do not necessarily reflect those of Global Investment Research and are not an official view of Goldman Sachs.
Any third party referenced herein, including any salespeople, traders and other professionals or members of their household, may have positions in the products mentioned that are inconsistent with the views expressed by analysts named in this report.
This research is focused on investment themes across markets, industries and sectors. It does not attempt to distinguish between the prospects or performance of, or provide analysis of, individual companies within any industry or sector we describe.
Any trading recommendation in this research relating to an equity or credit security or securities within an industry or sector is reflective of the investment theme being discussed and is not a recommendation of any such security in isolation.
This research is not an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It does not constitute a personal recommendation or take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients. Clients should consider whether any advice or recommendation in this research is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if appropriate, seek professional advice, including tax advice. The price and value of investments referred to in this research and the income from them may fluctuate. Past performance is not a guide to future performance, future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Fluctuations in exchange rates could have adverse effects on the value or price of, or income derived from, certain investments.
Certain transactions, including those involving futures, options, and other derivatives, give rise to substantial risk and are not suitable for all investors. Investors should review current options and futures disclosure documents which are available from Goldman Sachs sales representatives or at https://www.theocc.com/about/publications/character-risks.jsp and https://www.fiadocumentation.org/fia/regulatory-disclosures_1/fia-uniform-futures-and-options-on-futures-risk-disclosures-booklet-pdf-version-2018. Transaction costs may be significant in option strategies calling for multiple purchase and sales of options such as spreads. Supporting documentation will be supplied upon request.
Differing Levels of Service provided by Global Investment Research: The level and types of services provided to you by the Global Investment Research division of GS may vary as compared to that provided to internal and other external clients of GS, depending on various factors including your individual preferences as to the frequency and manner of receiving communication, your risk profile and investment focus and perspective (e.g., marketwide, sector specific, long term, short term), the size and scope of your overall client relationship with GS, and legal and regulatory constraints. As an example, certain clients may request to receive notifications when research on specific securities is published, and certain clients may request that specific data underlying analysts’ fundamental analysis available on our internal client websites be delivered to them electronically through data feeds or otherwise. No change to an analyst’s fundamental research views (e.g., ratings, price targets, or material changes to earnings estimates for equity securities), will be communicated to any client prior to inclusion of such information in a research report broadly disseminated through electronic publication to our internal client websites or through other means, as necessary, to all clients who are entitled to receive such reports.
All research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our internal client websites. Not all research content is redistributed to our clients or available to third-party aggregators, nor is Goldman Sachs responsible for the redistribution of our research by third party aggregators. For research, models or other data related to one or more securities, markets or asset classes (including related services) that may be available to you, please contact your GS representative or go to https://research.gs.com.
Disclosure information is also available at https://www.gs.com/research/hedge.html or from Research Compliance, 200 West Street, New York, NY 10282.
© 2021 Goldman Sachs.
No part of this material may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any form by any means or (ii) redistributed without the prior written consent of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.